|
RECENT NEWS
Black FIrefighter awarded $1.17 Million in court
A jury awarded $1.17 million Friday to a black former Pasadena firefighter who said he was forced to retire after complaining for five years about other firefighters leaving blood, urine and feces in his bedding and scrawling a swastika on his equipment.
The penalty was just the latest case of a black firefighter alleging discrimination against a fire department in Los Angeles and surrounding communities.
Click Here to Continue...

Hope Takes on Hate
Gay man wins $1.9 Million in discrimination case
After 18 years as a cook or chef in various restaurants, Bruce Hope “wanted something more permanent”--a lifetime job with retirement and a pension. So he applied for a position as a cook with the State of California and qualified.
A gay man diagnosed as HIV positive just before he started working for the state, Hope initially did on-call and temporary work.
Click Here to Continue...

Sexual Harassment Plaintiff gets
$11.6 Million
A Manhattan federal jury slammed Madison Square Garden and its chairman with a $11.6 million judgment Tuesday after finding that a female marketing executive had been sexually harassed by Knicks coach Isaiah Thomas and then fired after she complained.
Click Here to Continue...

No Hate Crimes
No Peace
The kidnapping, rape and torture of 20 year-old Megan Williams by two families of white West Virginians shocked the human sensibilities of all who learned of the ghastly crimes - with the exception of the local prosecutor. Despite the self-evident nature of their depraved, multi-day assaults on Ms. Williams' body and spirit - "this is what we do to Niggers" - the prosecutor refuses to charge the fiends with hate crimes, claiming he couldn't get a conviction.
Click Here to Continue...

|
An employer may not fire, demote, harass or otherwise “retaliate” against an individual for filing a charge of discrimination, participating in a discrimination proceeding, or otherwise opposing discrimination. The same laws that prohibit discrimination based on race, color, sex religion, national origin, age, and disability, as well as wage differences between men and women performing substantially equal work, also prohibit retaliation against individuals who oppose unlawful discrimination or participate in an employment discrimination proceeding.
In addition to the protections against retaliation that are included in all of the laws enforced by EEOC, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) also protects individuals from coercion, intimidation, threat, harassment, or interference in their exercise of their own rights or their encouragement of someone else’s exercise of rights granted by the ADA.
There are three main terms that are used to describe retaliation. Retaliation occurs when an employer, employment agency, or labor organization takes an adverse action against a covered individual because he or she engaged in a protected activity. These three terms are described below.
Adverse Action
An adverse action is an action taken to try to keep someone from opposing a discriminatory practice, or from participating in an employment discrimination proceeding. Examples of adverse actions include:
Employment actions such as termination, refusal to hire, and denial of promotion,
-
Other actions affecting employment such as threats, unjustified negative evaluations, unjustified negative references, or increased surveillance, and
-
Any other action such as an assault or unfounded civil or criminal charges that is likely to deter reasonable people from pursuing their rights.
Adverse actions do not include petty slights and annoyances, such as stray negative comments that are justified by an employee’s poor work performance or history.
Even if the prior protected activity alleged wrongdoing by a different employer, retaliatory adverse actions are unlawful. For example, it is unlawful for a worker’s current employer to retaliate against him for pursuing an EEO charge against a former employer.

 |